ali moslehi rad; soghra ebrahimi ghavam
Abstract
Regarding the purpose the stydy that is to compare cognitive styles (field dependent and field independent) and the degree of ,O usage of self - regulated teaming strategies among gifted and normal the sample of the study consisted of200 people (100boy and100 girls) were selected form the of Qazvin , ...
Read More
Regarding the purpose the stydy that is to compare cognitive styles (field dependent and field independent) and the degree of ,O usage of self - regulated teaming strategies among gifted and normal the sample of the study consisted of200 people (100boy and100 girls) were selected form the of Qazvin , via multi stage cluster sampling . The tools of this study , were group embedded figures test (witkine et al 1997), self - regulated learning questionnaire( pintrich & de groot 1991),also in order to control the inelegancy of subjects, the rieven test for adults was used. in order to statistical iS show that: 1-there is a significant difference between the cognitive analysis and pearson coefficient correlation were used. The results styles of gifted students and normal . 2- there is a significant . difference between the degree of applying self-regulated learning strategies in gifted and normal students .in orther words , the gifted students use more self- regulated teaming strategies. 3-in general of cognitive style and the degree of applying self-regulated learning strategies . 4-a significant positive relationship between congnitive 4 styls (field dependent and field independent) and self-regulated learning strategies was found.
